A custom rug sample or strike-off helps designers review selected color, material, construction and surface decisions before a full rug is made. It does not represent every detail of the finished piece. Review it with the current artwork and specification, record its scale and exclusions, and state precisely what is approved, what needs revision and whether the next stage is authorized.
The purpose of sampling is not to eliminate every natural variation in a handmade rug. It is to confirm that the design direction is sufficiently resolved for production and that everyone responsible for approval understands what the sample does—and does not—represent.
A strike-off is a small woven or constructed sample made to test selected elements of a custom rug before the full piece is produced. Depending on the project and the maker’s process, it may be used to review color relationships, fiber combinations, pile height, carving, relief, texture, weave, pattern scale, or a particular technical detail.
A strike-off is usually more informative than a digital rendering because it introduces real material, real light, and real construction. It lets the design team see how colors interact in fiber rather than on a screen, how sheen changes across the surface, and whether a high-low or carved effect reads as intended.
It is still a sample. A small area cannot fully reproduce the way a large rug will read across an entire room, how a repeat will move over a long distance, or how natural handmade variation will appear across the finished piece. Approval should therefore combine the physical sample with the final artwork, dimensions, color references, material specification, and production notes.
Custom rug development may involve several approval materials. The exact terminology and availability can vary, so confirm which tools apply to the specific WOVEN project before relying on them.
| Approval material | What it can help evaluate | What it usually cannot prove on its own |
|---|---|---|
| Yarn card | Individual yarn colors, fiber families, and preliminary palette relationships | Finished pile, density, texture, carving, or the interaction of colors once woven |
| Yarn pom or tuft | Fiber hand, approximate color, luster, and how yarn responds to light | Final construction, pattern clarity, surface density, or full-rug color balance |
| Digital rendering | Layout, crop, orientation, border, repeat, motif scale, and overall color placement | True material color, sheen, pile, texture, or handmade variation |
| Construction sample | Weave, pile, relief, carving, texture, edge treatment, and material interaction | The complete composition or the way a large field will read at room scale |
| Strike-off | A combined review of selected colors, materials, construction, pattern, and finish | Every variation in the final rug or the full visual effect of the completed size |
| Existing reference rug | General precedent for hand, quality, construction, palette, or finish | An exact guarantee when the new rug changes size, color, material, or design |
The approval package becomes stronger when these tools are used together. A rendering may confirm the complete layout while a strike-off confirms the tactile and material direction. Neither should silently replace the other.
A useful strike-off answers specific questions. Before requesting or reviewing one, identify which decisions remain open and which parts of the specification are already fixed.
A strike-off may be intended to confirm:
Write the purpose of the strike-off into the review notes. A sample intended primarily to approve color should not later be treated as proof of every construction detail unless those details were explicitly included and identified for approval.
The finished rug may be much larger than the strike-off. A full-scale section can show local line width and texture while leaving overall composition unresolved. A reduced composition shows more of the design but changes the scale of its details. Identify which kind of sample is under review before interpreting it. Directional sheen also needs comparison from the intended viewing positions.
A sample may not fully predict:
This is why the strike-off should be reviewed beside the final artwork and room plan. The sample answers material questions; the artwork and specification answer composition and dimensional questions.
Custom rug colors can be developed within the chosen maker's palette, fibers, and construction. Begin with physical references, then approve the color in yarn and in the intended rug surface. A screen image or paint name alone does not establish the finished result. Confirm WOVEN's available color-development options for the selected design before treating a requested match as achievable.
If an ivory sample looks right from one approach and too bright from another, first check pile direction, fiber sheen, and the room's light before requesting a new dye shade. Changing color without checking the surface can solve one view while making another less convincing. Keep color and texture approvals connected in the custom rug specification checklist.
Color approval should never rely on a single photograph or one type of light. Screens shift color, cameras compress tonal differences, and warm or cool lamps can significantly alter the relationship between yarns.
Review the sample in controlled stages:
When comments describe a color concern, avoid vague instructions such as “make it warmer” without a reference. Identify the exact yarn or area, describe the intended change, and provide an approved physical reference whenever possible.
Color often receives the most attention, but construction decisions can change the rug just as significantly. Use a consistent review order so visual and tactile details are not overlooked.
Confirm the specified fiber or blend and observe how it behaves from different angles. A lustrous fiber can make a single color appear to shift across the surface. That movement may be desirable, but it should be understood before approval.
Touch the sample and assess whether the surface feels as intended: dense or relaxed, smooth or irregular, crisp or soft, flat or dimensional. Compare it with the room’s function rather than judging texture only as an isolated object.
Review the difference between high and low areas, the transition between them, and whether the relief is strong enough to read at room scale. Confirm whether carving or clipping creates the intended line quality.
Compare the sample with the approved rendering. Confirm which portion of the design is represented and whether narrow lines, small motifs, curves, and gradients translate clearly in the selected construction.
If edge treatment is part of the approval sample, inspect its color, width, profile, and relationship to the field. If it is not represented, keep edge approval as a separate documented item before production release.
A written strike-off checklist separates the aspects represented by the sample from those still missing. Mark each decision against the sample and artwork revision being reviewed. An unshown detail stays open until the team reviews an appropriate reference.
| Review area | Approval question | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Sample identification | Does the label match the project, design, version, construction, and date? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Color | Are field, accent, border, and transition colors approved under project lighting? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Fiber | Are the fiber content, hand, and luster consistent with the specification? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Construction | Does the weave or knotting method produce the intended surface? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Pile and relief | Are pile height, carving, clipping, and high-low relationships approved? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Pattern | Do line quality, motif scale, crop, and transitions match the approved artwork? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Edge | Is the edge treatment shown and approved, or separately documented? | Approve / Revise / Not shown |
| Open items | Are all exclusions and items not represented by the sample listed clearly? | Complete / Incomplete |
A strike-off review record should distinguish observation, requested change and authorization. Copy the fields below and attach the labeled sample photographs and governing artwork. This is a blank review tool, not a completed WOVEN commission or a replacement for the order’s approval requirements.
| Review field | Entry to complete |
|---|---|
| Identity | Project / rug ID: ____; sample ID/revision: ____; artwork revision: ____; reviewer/date: ____. |
| Representation | Full-scale section or reduced composition: ____; region shown: ____; materials/construction represented: ____. |
| Viewing conditions | Room/finishes: ____; daylight/installed light: ____; viewing directions: ____. |
| Observed result | Area or photo reference: ____; observation: ____; accepted elements to retain: ____. |
| Requested revision | Change: ____; physical target/reference: ____; affected artwork, material or finish: ____. |
| Exclusions | Details not shown or not decided: ____; required evidence and owner: ____. |
| Next decision | Approved for stated scope / revise / pending: ____; resubmission required: ____; authorized next action: ____. |
Conditional approval needs a written boundary. Approval of color while the edge remains unshown is not approval of the edge. If a change affects an already reviewed material or surface, have WOVEN confirm what new evidence and authorization are needed before that change enters production. Keep any full-production release separate from permission to develop another sample.
Sampling can become inefficient when comments arrive from several people in separate emails, marked-up photographs, text messages, and meeting notes. The project team should identify one approval owner and issue one consolidated response for each version.
A strong comment package includes:
Comments should distinguish between a correction and a new design direction. Replacing an incorrect yarn reference is different from changing the approved palette. Enlarging a motif after sampling is different from correcting its execution. Clear classification helps the team understand what needs to be revised and what other parts of the design may be affected.
Every rendering, yarn submission, sample, and strike-off should carry a version identifier. Do not rely on phrases such as “the newest one” or “the warmer option.” A simple version system protects the approval chain.
Use identifiers such as:
The production-release record should state exactly which artwork version, color reference, strike-off, construction notes, dimensions, and edge details are approved. Superseded files should be marked clearly and removed from the active approval folder.
A proposed sampling workflow should connect each submission to its purpose, the consolidated review and the next action authorized. Agree the actual order requirements with WOVEN. Approval to revise or sample a detail is distinct from authorization to produce the complete rug.
Not every comment requires another physical sample, but substantial changes often justify one. The decision should reflect the risk of approving an untested change against the effect that another sampling round may have on the project schedule.
Another strike-off may be appropriate when the revision changes:
A minor, well-documented correction may sometimes be handled through written production notes, but that determination should be made with the rug maker. Confirm WOVEN’s current sample, revision, fee, deposit, return, and timing policies for the specific project before presenting them to a client.
A strike-off approval is only one part of production release. Before the full rug begins, confirm that the complete specification is aligned.
The broader custom process is covered in The Interior Designer’s Guide to Commissioning a Custom Rug. This sampling guide should be used as the focused approval layer within that larger process.
Studio WOVEN describes a practice built around researching, sketching, designing, coloring, sourcing, sampling, presenting, discussing, and delivering rugs. For a custom project, the design team should confirm the applicable sampling pathway, available submission types, and approval requirements directly with WOVEN before setting client expectations.
Interior designers and architects can also use the WOVEN Trade Portal for project-oriented tools and product information, or contact a WOVEN showroom to discuss a custom rug inquiry. Project-specific fees, deposits, sample returns, revision limits, timing, and production policies should be documented in the proposal or order materials for that project.
A strike-off is most valuable when the project team knows exactly what it is reviewing. Treat it as a controlled design decision rather than a general impression. Review it in the right light, compare it with the complete specification, record one set of comments, preserve version history, and release production only when every represented and unrepresented detail is understood.
The result is not the removal of all variation. It is a shared, documented standard that allows a handmade rug to move into production with fewer assumptions and a clearer connection to the room it was designed to complete.